“Punk Mi Bai”: The Iligan City Hardcore Punk Movement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study details the Iligan City Hardcore Punk Movement as a subculture in the music scene with its own style, event preferences and ideologies. The lifeworld of the Punx, as members are called, is described using focus ethnography through the sociological lens of Emile Durkheim's notion of the collective effervescence and the New Social Movements Theory. The study examines the Punx experiences in terms of their sense of collective identity and through its adapted influences. This also describes how the local music scene operates as an influence itself. The study reveals that during events (shows and gigs), this movement comes together and spontaneously communicates collective thoughts and ideologies in a collective effervescence as one unified unit. It is argued that this is an emerging New Social Movement as punk operates in social mobilization through cultural innovation, identity and lifestyle transformation, with self-limiting radicalism against the social establishments and existing structures. The Iligan City Hardcore Punk Movement is a collective of individuals that exists under the nose of mainstream music culture. They are often misunderstood and branded negatively but persists on preserving their autonomous and often-underappreciated contribution to the music community in particular, and the public in general.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".