MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415304469 · doi:10.18733/cpi29787

Disrupting Ableism: Education with, by and for Learners with Disability as Equity and Social Justice Education

2025· article· W4415304469 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Bathseba Opini, Erica Neeganagwedgin, Ali A. Abdi

Bibliographic record

VenueCultural and Pedagogical Inquiry · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisability Education and Employment
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial justiceEquity (law)Social equalitySpecial educationEconomic Justice

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Call for Submissions for the Winter 2026 (Volume 17, No. 2) Special Issue of Cultural and Pedagogical Inquiry entitled Disrupting Ableism: Education with, by and for Learners with Disability as Equity and Social Justice Education with Guest Editors Bathseba Opini, Erica Neeganagwedgin and Ali Abdi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.008
Scholarly communication0.0160.013
Open science0.0020.011
Research integrity0.0100.020
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.448
GPT teacher head0.547
Teacher spread0.098 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCultural and Pedagogical InquirySame topicDisability Education and EmploymentFrench-language works237,207