Harnessing AI for Climate Action: Opportunities, Challenges, and Pathways to Sustainable Futures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Climate change poses a pressing 21st-century challenge, demanding urgent strategies for mitigation and adaptation. Artificial intelligence (AI) emerges as a transformative tool, influencing environmental policy and practices across sectors. With its growing capabilities, AI enables analysis of large datasets, predicts climate patterns, optimizes energy use, and enhances resource management, in a way that promotes informed decision-making for climate solutions. Mitigation strategies benefit significantly from AI, with machine learning improving energy efficiency, optimizing supply chains, and forecasting energy demands to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. AI-driven modeling also evaluates carbon capture, reforestation, as well as renewable energy projects and provides data-driven insights into their scalability and impact. For adaptation, AI supports predictive analytics for urban planning, agriculture, and disaster management, addressing shifting climate conditions and socio-economic factors. For instance, AI forecasts extreme weather, enabling proactive risk reduction, while precision agriculture adapts crop varieties to changing climates, strengthening food security. However, integrating AI into climate action faces challenges, including the need for high-quality datasets, often scarce in developing regions, and the risks of algorithmic bias, which can perpetuate inequalities. The energy demands of AI technologies, such as hyperscale data centers, also raise environmental concerns, complicating its role as a sustainable solution. These issues highlight the need for responsible implementation. Despite these hurdles, AI’s potential to drive progress in climate strategies is immense when applied ethically. Interdisciplinary collaborations combining AI, environmental science, and policy expertise can deliver innovative, context-specific solutions. As stakeholders tackle climate demands, AI’s ability to revolutionize sustainability is undeniable, provided it is deployed conscientiously to ensure equitable and effective climate action.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.026 | 0.033 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".