MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415312366 · doi:10.1016/j.omtm.2025.101595

Characterization of adeno-associated viral transduction of retinal ganglion cells in adult and old mice

2025· article· en· W4415312366 on OpenAlexafffund
Delaney Cm Henderson, Balwantray C. Chauhan

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Therapy — Methods & Clinical Development · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsTransduction (biophysics)Signal transductionRetinal ganglion cellTransgeneRetinalGenetically modified mouseRetina

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors are being used increasingly in developing treatments for age-related ocular diseases, including those impacting retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), the output neurons of the eye. However, the effects of persistent transgene expression on RGC structure and function have not been thoroughly investigated. In this study, viral transduction was studied in parallel cohorts of adult (3–6 month-old) and old (18–24 month-old) mice and the persistence of viral expression characterized in aging mice. Age-related differences in viral transduction were investigated using in vivo imaging and immunohistochemical analyses. Effects of viral transduction on RGC function were examined using calcium imaging in intact-isolated retinal preparations. We demonstrate that AAV expression persists over 18 months following a single viral injection. Decreases in RGC density observed in AAV-injected aged mice were not significantly different from age-matched controls, suggesting age-related RGC loss unrelated to viral injection. Moreover, mice aged to 18 months post-AAV injection and old mice had similar loss of RGC function when compared to adult mice, despite differences in transduction durations. Our study found no deleterious effects of AAV transduction and highlights the potential of AAV-based methods for long-term RGC labeling and therapeutic strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.727

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Therapy — Methods & Clinical DevelopmentSame topicVirus-based gene therapy researchFrench-language works237,207