MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415319298 · doi:10.1139/cjfas-2025-0039

Caught in the surge: effects of a pulse of suspended sediments from agricultural run-off on Atlantic salmon smolts

2025· article· en· W4415319298 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Carole‐Anne Gillis, Cindy Breau, Emma Duquenne-Delobel, Lena Guimard, Anne Crémazy

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New BrunswickUniversité du Québec à RimouskiFisheries and Oceans CanadaInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeawaterSmoltificationSalmoTurbidityGillPulse (music)Fish farmingAquatic animalAquaculture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Suspended sediments (SS) from agricultural run-off pose an increasing risk to Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar) smolts, with unclear consequences to smoltification and seawater tolerance. We investigated how an environmentally relevant SS pulse affects migrating smolts. In a lab setting, smolts were exposed to an 11 h SS pulse at 0, 20, 60, and 100 NTU (nephelometric turbidity unit) (∼0, 10, 50, and 80 mg/L total SS). Fish then recovered for 43 h in clean freshwater (mimicking completion of river migration), followed by a 24 h seawater challenge (mimicking marine entry). Exposure to SS induced rapid gill secondary lamellae thickening (up to 1.15-fold), elevated blood glucose (up to 1.5-fold) and a slight decrease in plasma chloride (up to 1.1-fold). Transient reductions in gill Na+/K+-ATPase activity and blood hematocrit were observed after 5 h, possibly due to gill remodeling. Physiological recovery was observed after 43 h in clear freshwater, and seawater tolerance was unaffected. Overall, SS exposure could transiently affect the physiology of down-migrating Atlantic salmon smolts, but with limited impact on subsequent seawater tolerance under the tested conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences→Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→