MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415319550 · doi:10.1016/j.jsse.2025.09.008

Autonomous navigation and control strategy for deorbiting of satellites with unknown orbital parameters

2025· article· en· W4415319550 on OpenAlexafffund
Alina Toidjanov, Sajad Saraygord Afshari, Philip Ferguson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Space Safety Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpace Satellite Systems and Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSatelliteControl (management)Low earth orbitOrbital mechanicsGeocentric orbitControl theory (sociology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent shift from a 25-year to a 5-year deorbit requirement underscores the urgent need for more robust, flexible satellite disposal methods. In this work, we present an autonomous, self-contained guidance and control approach that uses only a magnetometer, sun sensor, and gyroscope to determine orbital parameters and execute a propellant-efficient deorbit. By blending Particle Swarm Optimization and Power Spectral Density analysis, the proposed method accurately refines unknown orbital parameters without recourse to high-end sensors or external tracking. Simulation results conducted on multiple orbits—from 400 km (ISS altitude) up to 650 km Sun-synchronous trajectories–demonstrate consistent convergence within a defined cost threshold, ensuring reliable five-year compliance. This integrated architecture minimizes mass and power overhead, making it well-suited for budget-conscious CubeSats and other small missions. Moreover, by automating both orbit determination and continuous thruster control within a single compact framework, the solution bridges the gap between academic innovation and immediate industry demands for safe, cost-effective end-of-life satellite disposal. The presented work substantially enhances existing deorbiting paradigms by offering a feasible, low-complexity route to sustainable space operations under increasingly stringent regulatory requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.411
Threshold uncertainty score0.655

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Space Safety EngineeringSame topicSpace Satellite Systems and ControlFrench-language works237,207