MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415320950 · doi:10.70070/kvmk6m02

The Association of Valacyclovir Prophylaxis with the Suppression of Recurrent Genital Herpes: A Systematic Review

2025· review· W4415320950 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Indra Hadi Rapmartua Ompusunggu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Journal of Medical Science and Health Research · 2025
Typereview
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSystematic reviewPlaceboClinical trialRandomized controlled trialMeta-analysisValaciclovirPsychosocialDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction : Recurrent genital herpes (RGH), a chronic condition primarily caused by Herpes Simplex Virus type 2 (HSV-2), represents a significant global health concern, imposing a substantial clinical and psychosocial burden on affected individuals (Fife et al., 2007; Romanowski, Marina and Roberts, 2003). Valacyclovir, a prodrug of acyclovir with enhanced oral bioavailability, is a cornerstone of pharmacological management (Baker et al., 1999). This systematic review aims to critically evaluate and synthesize the evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the efficacy and safety of valacyclovir prophylaxis for the suppression of RGH. Methods : A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted to identify relevant RCTs. Studies were included if they evaluated daily suppressive valacyclovir therapy against placebo, another antiviral, or a different valacyclovir dose in adults with RGH. The study selection process followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data on study design, participant characteristics, interventions, and predefined outcomes were extracted. The methodological quality of each included study was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool (Sterne et al., 2019). Results : Seventeen RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The evidence consistently demonstrates the superiority of valacyclovir over placebo in suppressing RGH. A network meta-analysis showed a significantly lower risk of having at least one clinical recurrence with valacyclovir versus placebo (Le Cleach et al., 2014). Suppressive therapy reduces the frequency of genital herpes recurrences by 70%-80% (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2021). It also potently reduces total genital HSV shedding by up to 78% (Martens et al., 2009) and decreases the risk of HSV-2 transmission to susceptible heterosexual partners by approximately 48% (Corey et al., 2004). Compared to acyclovir, valacyclovir offered comparable clinical efficacy with the convenience of less frequent dosing (Reitano et al., 1998; Public Health Agency of Canada, 2024). In specific populations, valacyclovir prophylaxis initiated at 36 weeks of gestation significantly reduced recurrences at delivery (Hollier and Wendel, 2008), and a twice-daily regimen was found to be most effective for HIV-coinfected individuals (DeJesus et al., 2003; Warren, Harris and Brennan, 2004). Patient-reported outcomes strongly favored suppressive therapy over episodic treatment, with significant improvements in quality of life and treatment satisfaction (Romanowski, Marina and Roberts, 2003). The long-term safety profile of valacyclovir was favorable and comparable to placebo (Brown et al., 2005; Reitano et al., 1998). Discussion : The synthesized evidence confirms the high efficacy of valacyclovir prophylaxis, which stems from its advantageous pharmacokinetic profile (Baker et al., 1999). The enhanced bioavailability of valacyclovir allows for a simplified once-daily dosing regimen, which improves patient adherence and overall quality of life (Romanowski, Marina and Roberts, 2003). The potent suppression of virologic shedding is the key mechanism underlying both the reduction in clinical recurrences for the individual and the significant public health benefit of reduced sexual transmission (Corey et al., 2004; Martens et al., 2009). The evidence supports an individualized dosing strategy based on recurrence frequency and host immune status (Reitano et al., 1998; Warren, Harris and Brennan, 2004). Conclusion : Valacyclovir prophylaxis is a highly effective, safe, and well-tolerated first-line intervention for the management of recurrent genital herpes. It significantly reduces clinical and virologic manifestations of the disease, improves patient quality of life, and serves as a critical tool for reducing sexual transmission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.035
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.035
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.010
Bibliometrics0.0060.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.138
GPT teacher head0.528
Teacher spread0.390 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Journal of Medical Science and Health ResearchSame topicHerpesvirus Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207