Antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in sea surface aerosols over the Atlantic Ocean
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The large-scale abundance and distribution of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) within the atmosphere remains poorly documented, particularly over oceans. This study explores bacterial loads, diversity, and associated antimicrobial resistance genes in aerosols over the North Atlantic Ocean. Aerosol samples were collected from a ship during a cruise from Brest (France) to Woods Hole (USA) for 24-h periods using a mast-mounted system, with additional one-hour spot samples taken daily and nightly using high-flow rates samplers. The airborne concentrations of bacteria along with 21 ARG subtypes as indicators of key resistance families were monitored using qPCR. These were related to the bacterial diversity obtained from same samples through ribosomal gene amplicon sequencing, and to the geographical origin of the air masses estimated using atmospheric dynamics models. Total ARG concentrations ranged from background concentrations of a few copies to >10 5 copies/m 3 of air. Near coasts, macrolide and tetracycline resistance genes were dominant (up to 93 % and 38 % of the total ARG monitored here, respectively). While sulfonamide resistance genes were also detected further offshore, those related to transposases and β-lactamases were detected only sporadically. The multiple observed correlations between the aforementioned gene concentrations in the air and potential soil-derived microorganisms may be indicative of continental inputs. Conversely, the prevalence of quinolone resistance ( qepA ) in the air over the open ocean points toward a contribution from marine surfaces, supported by associations between several ARGs and marine microorganisms including cyanobacteria. These may thus act as environmental reservoirs of ARGs, and sources for further environmental spread notably by air means. • Antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) are detected in the air oversea from coast to coast. • Offshore prevalence of quinolone ARGs suggests the ocean is a major resistance reservoir. • Marked heterogeneity in ARGs composition reflects multiple source origins. • Continental signatures persist offshore, supporting long distance transport of ARGs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".