Correction to “Vulnerability Patterns and Trends—An Exploration of a Decade of <i>Public Health Nursing</i> Editorials”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Palese A., S. Chiappinotto, B. Dobrowolska, F. Timmins, D. Baptiste, and Y. S. Üzar-Özçetin. 2025. “Vulnerability Patterns and Trends—An Exploration of a Decade of Public Health Nursing Editorials.” Public Health Nursing 42, no. 3: 1133–1136. https://doi.org/10.1111/phn.13547. The co-author, Diana Baptiste, was erroneously omitted from the author byline. The corrected author byline is: Alvisa Palese, Stefania Chiappinotto, Beata Dobrowolska, Fiona Timmins, Diana Baptiste and Yeter Sinem Üzar-Özçetin We apologize for this error.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".