Divergent roles of DNA methylation, TRIM28, and p53 surveillance in human embryonic and trophoblast stem cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY Transcriptional regulation of transposons and genes by TRIM28 and 5mC is critical for proper mammalian embryonic development, but the specific roles for these mediators in human embryonic and placental lineage remain unclear. We find that loss of TRIM28 has a limited effect on global transposon expression and instead results in upregulation of genes proximal to TRIM28-bound Long Terminal Repeats (LTRs) in both human trophoblast stem cells (hTSCs) and human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). MER11A elements show especially strong regulatory importance in hTSCs: these elements are bound by both TRIM28 and placental transcription factors and show both heterochromatic and euchromatic features. Some genes are positively regulated by MER11A elements in hTSC basal state, while other MER11A-proximal genes show upregulation only upon TRIM28 deletion. By contrast, loss of DNA methylation in hESCs or hTSCs leads to a global increase in transposon expression. While many genic 5mC targets are shared in hESCs and hTSCs, we also observe evidence that a handful of genes important for somatic development are repressed by 5mC in trophoblast, while a small parallel set of placental genes are repressed by methylation in embryonic tissue. Interestingly, loss of DNMT1 causes hESCs to be rapidly lost from culture in a TP53 and mitotic surveillance checkpoint-dependent manner, while hTSCs show little p53 response to DNMT1 loss or DNA damage generally, instead showing gradual mitotic defects and aneuploidy and slow loss from culture. This discrepancy may explain the higher frequency of karyotypic abnormality found in human placental cells. Together, this study charts the role of TRIM28 and DNA methylation in regulating embryonic and placental transcription and demonstrates divergent p53-dependent responses to genomic instability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".