MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415346474 · doi:10.34925/eip.2025.182.9.260

ГОСУДАРСТВЕННАЯ ПОДДЕРЖКА ЦИФРОВОГО СЕЛЬСКОГО ХОЗЯЙСТВА НА ЗАПАДЕ: РЕКОМЕНДАЦИИ ДЛЯ СТРАН С ФОРМИРУЮЩЕЙСЯ ЦИФРОВОЙ ЭКОНОМИКОЙ

2025· article· ru· W4415346474 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueЭкономика и предпринимательство · 2025
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Development and Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Order (exchange)Big dataInternet of ThingsKey (lock)Digital transformationDigital economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Данная статья исследует государственные меры поддержки цифровизации АПК в западных странах (ЕС, США, Канада, Австралия) с целью выявления условий их экономической эффективности и возможностей адаптации данного опыта в других регионах. В исследовании систематизированы ключевые направления цифровой трансформации агросектора, включая точное земледелие, использование больших данных, IoT и автоматизацию. Проведен сравнительный анализ механизмов государственной поддержки (субсидии, налоговые льготы, инфраструктурные проекты) и оценена их результативность на основе экономических показателей. Особое внимание уделено факторам, влияющим на успешность внедрения цифровых технологий, таким как уровень цифровой грамотности, доступность инфраструктуры и институциональная среда. На основе проведенного анализа сформулированы рекомендации для стран с формирующейся цифровой экономикой, включая оптимальные модели государственного регулирования, условия адаптации зарубежного опыта и меры по снижению рисков. Результаты исследования представляют практическую ценность для policymakers и агропредприятий, заинтересованных в ускоренной и эффективной цифровой модернизации. This article examines government measures to support the digitalization of agriculture in Western countries (EU, USA, Canada, Australia) in order to identify the conditions of their economic efficiency and the possibilities of adapting this experience in other regions. The study systematizes the key areas of digital transformation of the agricultural sector, including precision agriculture, the use of big data, IoT and automation. A comparative analysis of government support mechanisms (subsidies, tax incentives, infrastructure projects) was carried out and their effectiveness was assessed based on economic indicators. Special attention is paid to the factors influencing the success of the introduction of digital technologies, such as the level of digital literacy, accessibility of infrastructure and the institutional environment. Based on the analysis, recommendations have been formulated for countries with emerging digital economies, including optimal models of government regulation, conditions for adapting foreign experience, and risk mitigation measures. The results of the study are of practical value for policy makers and agricultural enterprises interested in accelerated and effective digital modernization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it