MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415349950 · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(25)00300-6

Impact of scaling up breastfeeding on reducing the global burden of non-communicable diseases in mothers and children: a population-based modelling analysis for 132 low-income and middle-income countries

2025· article· en· W4415349950 on OpenAlexaff
Divya Bhandari, Wafaie Fawzi, Mandana Arabi, Goodarz Danaei

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Global Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreastfeeding Practices and Influences
Canadian institutionsNutrition International
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreastfeedingBreast feedingDeveloping countryGlobal healthBurden of diseaseMEDLINEDeveloped country

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Growing evidence suggests breastfeeding offers long-term protective effects against non-communicable diseases (NCDs) later in life in mothers and their offspring. These benefits could be substantial at the population level but have not yet been rigorously quantified. We aimed to estimate the population-level effect of scaling up exclusive breastfeeding on long-term NCD burden in mothers and their offspring in 132 low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS: In this population-based modelling analysis, we developed mathematical simulation models based on the population impact fraction estimator and leveraging available effect estimates and global input data. We conducted umbrella reviews to obtain pooled effect estimates from high-quality meta-analyses, with quality assessed using AMSTAR-2. Input data included cause-specific mortality (Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study), diabetes and hypertension prevalence (NCD Risk Factor Collaboration), baseline exclusive breastfeeding coverage (WHO-UNICEF), and demographics (UN Population Division). We quantified delayed cause-specific NCD deaths, averted diabetes and hypertension cases, and years of life gained (YLG) across four exclusive breastfeeding coverage scenarios. All future benefits were discounted (3% rate). FINDINGS: Scaling up exclusive breastfeeding coverage to 90% in 132 LMICs could delay 0·17% of NCD deaths across the two generations, equivalent to 72 300 delayed NCD deaths annually, yielding 1·04 million YLG. It substantially reduced type 2 diabetes prevalence by 1·29% (10 million cases averted across the lifespan of the cohort) and moderately reduced hypertension prevalence by 0·17% (3·8 million averted cases). The maternal generation constituted 42% of delayed deaths, 23% of averted diabetes cases, and approximately half of the total YLG. Regionally, southeast Asia, east Asia, and Oceania followed by south Asia had the largest absolute benefits due to population size; however, after adjusting for cohort and population size, sub-Saharan Africa and north Africa and the Middle East showed the largest benefits per million intervened mothers. Most delayed deaths were from ischaemic heart disease (43%) and stroke (33%), with cancer accounting for 18%. INTERPRETATION: Scaling up exclusive breastfeeding coverage could lead to benefits in reducing NCDs, complementing its established benefits for child mortality and early childhood development. FUNDING: Nutrition International.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Global HealthSame topicBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207