MRI-based classifier to identify close-to-onset cases in <i>C9orf72</i> genetic frontotemporal dementia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Predicting symptom onset in genetic frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is crucial for advancing targeted interventions and clinical trial design. Brain changes begin years before clinical symptoms emerge, making neuroimaging a strong candidate for onset prediction. However, FTD is highly heterogeneous, encompassing diverse molecular pathologies, affected brain networks, and symptom trajectories. This variability limits the predictive power of any single imaging biomarker and underscores the need for an integrative, multimodal approach to improve prediction accuracy and generalizability. We used machine learning to integrate diverse neuroimaging features, identifying a robust signature for risk stratification. We analyzed T1-weighted and T2-weighted MRI scans from 71 symptomatic C9orf72 carriers, 90 presymptomatic carriers, and 69 healthy controls from the GENFI cohort. We used FreeSurfer to measure cortical thickness and subcortical volumes, and BISON to quantify white matter hyperintensities (WMH). We applied Principal Component Analysis for dimensionality reduction and trained a random forest classifier to distinguish symptomatic carriers from controls. The model was subsequently applied to the presymptomatic cohort to identify individuals whose brain patterns resembled those of symptomatic cases, under the hypothesis that greater similarity indicated a higher risk of conversion. We validated the model with neuropsychological data and a two-year longitudinal follow-up. The classifier distinguished symptomatic C9orf72 carriers from controls with 87.0% accuracy. When applied to presymptomatic carriers, the model identified 21.1% of the cohort as having brain features comparable to those of symptomatic cases. This “high-risk group” showed significant neuropsychological weaknesses in executive function, language and social cognition compared to the non high-risk group. The model accurately predicted clinical conversion within a two-year period with 84.5% accuracy, a 70% sensitivity and a 93.3% negative predictive value. Our findings demonstrate the utility of a machine learning approach using multi-modal MRI to identify presymptomatic C9orf72 carriers at high risk of disease onset within the next two years. By capturing subtle neuroanatomical patterns associated with disease processes, this approach offers a promising method for stratifying genetic FTD carriers prior to symptom onset. Such predictive models could optimize patient selection in future clinical trials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".