MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415353191 · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2025.3623097

A Lighter and Faster One-Stage Algorithm for Object Detection in Remote Sensing Images

2025· article· W4415353191 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrared Target Detection Methodologies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Foundation for Science and Technology Development
KeywordsObject detectionContext (archaeology)Feature extractionFeature (linguistics)Computational complexity theoryKey (lock)Representation (politics)Object (grammar)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Remote sensing images processing and analysis face significant challenges due to varying object scales and complex backgrounds. Existing detection algorithms often suffer from high computational complexity and suboptimal performance. A lightweight algorithm SCC-YOLO was proposed for remote sensing objects detection. It incorporates three key innovations: (1) Slimneck-V feature fusion architecture to enhance multi-scale adaptability while reducing computational load. (2) Cross Stage Partial with Context Anchor Attention (C2CAA) module to improve feature representation of key object regions. (3) Cross Stage Partial with Ghost (CSPGhost) module that optimizes feature extraction efficiency. The algorithm is validated on DOTA and RSOD datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that, compared to baseline algorithms, SCC-YOLO reduces model parameters by 15.3% and computational complexity by 26%. On the DOTA dataset, detection accuracy and inference speed are improved by 3.9% and 6.5%, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.643
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it