A multi-user game-based system for planning modular construction activities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Supply chain (SC) planning in modular construction (MC) can be challenging because it requires interconnected and complex activities among various teams and across different project stages. Recently, game engines have been increasingly used to resolve these challenges, as they create realistic virtual environments and simulations of possible scenarios before actual project implementation. However, game engine applications have been restricted to single-user and centralized models, limiting real-time collaboration among MC teams. Within a Design Science Research methodology, this study proposes an intelligent game-based modular planning (GAMMOD) system, supported by multi-user functions, which is flexible in terms of access, allowing for either non-immersive or immersive mode, depending on the available hardware tools, for collaborative planning of the MC-SC. The GAMMOD system integrates a blockchain protocol for data security in the non-immersive mode, while the immersive mode relies on user credentials authorization. The GAMMOD system considers both numerical key performance indicators, such as sustainability, cost, and time, as well as practical ones, including road dimensions, module clearance, and possible clashes. Two distinct case studies, representing different MC types, are presented to illustrate the features of the GAMMOD system. The evaluation tests of the GAMMOD system conducted by 14 MC experts have shown a general consensus on its functionality, with 80% to 100% of the participants agreeing or strongly agreeing on the GAMMOD system’s performance. Additionally, the GAMMOD system demonstrated a usability score of 75.7, surpassing the established threshold of 70. The GAMMOD system is expected to help MC stakeholders make informed, collaborative decisions and develop a shared understanding of decision feasibility, potential conflicts, and constraints before the commencement of the MC project.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".