Protein oxidation in feed: Occurrence, monitoring, and mitigation strategies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Protein oxidation is defined as a covalent modification caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) or secondary oxidized by-products. The mechanisms and influences of protein oxidation on animal-derived food quality have been studied for many years, but its effects on feedstuff and animal health are largely unknown. Protein oxidation causes oxidation in both amino acid side chains and protein backbones, resulting in the formation of harmful substances and a decrease in nutritional value. Excessive levels of protein oxidation in animal diets have been associated with various biological consequences in animals, including reduced growth performance, compromised antioxidant capacity, immune disorders, and intestinal digestion and absorption, and antioxidant capacity. Protein oxidation in feeds can be detected by various methods such as spectrophotometric assay and fluorescence spectroscopy and controlled by several approaches such as supplementation of antioxidants and nutrition regulation. In this review, the basic principles of protein oxidation and its detection methods, effects on animals, and preventive strategies are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".