MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415358911 · doi:10.24095/hpcdp.45.10.03

Prevalence of childhood cancer in Canada: an analysis using 5-year, 18-year and 25-year limited-duration prevalence from the CYP-C data tool

2025· article· en· W4415358911 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Katherine McKenzie, Lin Xie, Rana Khafagy, Christina Ricci, Vera Grywacheski

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in Canada · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenPublic Health Agency of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChildhood cancerPublic healthChildhood leukemiaCancerEpidemiologyCancer registryYoung adultPublic health surveillanceHealth data

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Survivors of childhood cancers can face life-long health risks. In this study we describe the prevalence of childhood cancer in Canada by type, geographic region, year, age group and sex, using publicly available data in the Cancer in Young People in Canada (CYP-C) data tool. By 2021, 4325 people aged less than 20 years who had received a cancer diagnosis within the previous 5 years were still alive. The age-standardized 5-year prevalence increased by 12% over the past 15 years. Leukemia was the most prevalent childhood cancer. The CYP-C data tool provides comprehensive and timely public health surveillance statistics to understand the burden of childhood cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.012
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention in CanadaSame topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207