MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415360286 · doi:10.59934/jaiea.v5i1.1602

Automated Fertilizer Spraying System for Purple Eggplant Plants Based on IoT at STMIK KAPUTAMA

2025· article· W4415360286 on OpenAlexaff
Aldi Rudiansyah, Relita Buaton, Milli Alfhi Syari

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicMultimedia Learning Systems
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFertilizerInternet of ThingsMoistureSoil moisture sensorMicrocontrollerGreenhouse

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purple eggplant plant (Solanum melongena L) is a high-value vegetable crop that requires proper fertilization to support optimal growth. However, the manual fertilization methods currently in use are often inefficient and inaccurate, leading to fertilizer waste and suboptimal harvest yields. This study developed an automatic fertilizer spraying system based on the Internet of Things (IoT) using a NodeMCU ESP8266 microcontroller and soil moisture sensors to monitor soil conditions in real-time. The system is equipped with an RTC module and the Blynk app to automatically adjust fertilizer application based on soil moisture levels between 50% and 60%. Test results demonstrate that the system can efficiently activate the pump when moisture drops below the minimum threshold and deactivate it when moisture reaches the maximum threshold. Implementing this system improves fertilizer efficiency compared to manual methods and facilitates remote control, thereby supporting increased productivity and the development of purple eggplant farming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA)Same topicMultimedia Learning SystemsFrench-language works237,207