MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415360441 · doi:10.59934/jaiea.v5i1.1516

Application of IoT Technology for Automatic Provisioning Systems in Freshwater Fish Farming at STMIK Kaputama

2025· article· W4415360441 on OpenAlexaff
Zulkifli Pratama, Husnul Khair, Ratih Puspadini

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring Technologies
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiometricsAuthentication (law)Android (operating system)Fingerprint (computing)ProvisioningFingerprint recognitionInternet of ThingsSoftware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of secure vault systems is essential in addressing limitations found in traditional security mechanisms, such as physical keys and numerical combinations. This study presents the design and implementation of an Internet of Things (IoT)-based vault security system that integrates dual biometric authentication, facial recognition using ESP32-CAM, and fingerprint verification using the AS608 sensor. The system enforces a sequential authentication process, ensuring the facial scan is verified before activating the fingerprint module. Successful dual authentication triggers a solenoid lock to grant access, enhances security, and prevents unauthorized entry. The system communicates with Firebase for real-time status updates and access logs, which can be monitored through an Android application. Hardware and software testing confirmed the effectiveness of component integration, biometric reliability, and real-time connectivity. The device also operates effectively on battery power, increasing portability. The results demonstrate that dual biometric verification significantly increases vault security while providing a practical and efficient user experience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA)Same topicWater Quality Monitoring TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207