Development of a Dual Biometric Authentication System Based on IoT with Facial Recognition and Fingerprint for Safe Security
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Protecting valuable assets requires a security system that adapts to modern challenges, where physical keys or numerical codes on conventional safes are vulnerable to loss, duplication, and breaking. This research develops an Internet of Things (IoT)-based dual biometric authentication system with face recognition using ESP32-CAM and AS608 fingerprint verification performed sequentially, granting access only if both authentication stages are successful. The NodeMCU ESP32 is used as the main controller, integrating the authentication process with the solenoid lock and buzzer, and utilizing Firebase Realtime Database for real-time monitoring of status and access history through an Android application. Unlike previous research, which only used face recognition with manual verification via Telegram, this system is fully automated with multi-layer authentication, making it more secure and efficient. The prototyping method is used to design, program, and test the system, with testing results showing 100% success in opening the safe only for registered users, making this system more reliable than single authentication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".