MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415361476 · doi:10.1134/s0869593825700297

Some Aspects of Studying the Wrangel Island’s Geology (Commentary to the Work “New Data on the Late Paleozoic Conglomerates of Wrangel Island and Their Geological Interpretation” by M.I. Tuchkova et al.)

2025· article· en· W4415361476 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
V. G. Ganelin

Bibliographic record

VenueStratigraphy and Geological Correlation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaleozoicHistorical geologySedimentologyStratigraphyStructural geologyStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Critical remarks are given to the article “New data on the Late Paleozoic conglomerates of Wrangel Island and their geological interpretation” by M.I. Tuchkova et al. published in the Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation journal (vol. 33, no. 2. pp. 59–80, 2025). Doubts are expressed about using the ‘tectonostratigraphic units’ term in the geological mapping of the island instead of formations and strata. It is concluded that, in terms of paleogeography, the Late Paleozoic De Long basin had closer links with the Verkhoyansk‒Kolyma basins than with the Canadian Arctic ones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.375

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStratigraphy and Geological CorrelationSame topicGeological Studies and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207