MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415362749 · doi:10.3917/ersu.014.0159

L’exigence d’une coopération loyale dans le droit des sûretés de l’espace OHADA

2021· article· W4415362749 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Raymond Mafo Diffo

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l ERSUMA · 2021
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSet (abstract data type)Government (linguistics)Context (archaeology)Legislation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Article 1134, paragraph 3 of the Civil Code, providing that: "They (agreements) shall be performed in good faith" laid down the principle of good faith.This requirement was subsequently extended to the contract formation phase.when we refer to Article 1375 of the Civil Code in Quebec, which provides: 'Good faith must govern the conduct of the parties, both at the time the obligation arises and at the time it is performed and expired, we can say that this extension of good faith starts to be taken into account by the legislator.Good faith, which we will liken here to loyalty, has become one of the essential elements of every and each contract, to the point that it constitutes a general principle of law.The creation of securities refers to the conclusion of contracts which purpose is to guarantee the performance of an obligation, and to this end the OHADA Uniform Act organizing securities has at several levels enshrined provisions to ensure compliance with contractual ethics.This requirement of loyal cooperation between the parties is expressed firstly in a very diffuse and Organisation pour l'harmonisation en Afrique du droit des affaires (OHADA) | Telecharge le 21/10/2025 sur https://shs.cairn.info(IP: 174.140.237.21)REVUE DE L'ERSUMA 2021 -1 / N°14157 general way through obligations to do or not to do of legislative or case law origin, with a view to protecting the interests of all the parties to the contract when implementing securities; and secondly in a specific way through the obligation to inform which promotes cooperation between the parties to the contract. ResumoO princípio está consagrado no artigo 1134º, nº3, do Código Civil, segundo o qual: "Elas (as convenções) devem ser executadas de boa fé", exigência posteriormente alargada à fase de celebração do contrato.Esta extensão da boa-fé começa a ser levada em consideração pelo legislador se nos referirmos ao artigo 1375° do Código Civil de Quebec que dispõe: "A boa-fé deve reger a conduta das partes, tanto no momento do nascimento da obrigação quanto da sua execução e de sua extinção ".A boa fé, que aqui assimilaremos aqui à lealdade, tornou-se um dos elementos essenciais de todo contrato e de cada contrato, à ponto de constituir um princípio geral de direito.A constituição de garantias remete para a celebração de contratos que visam garantir o cumprimento de uma obrigação e, para o efeito, o Acto Uniforme OHADA sobre o ao direito das garantias consagrou, à vários níveis, disposições para garantir o cumprimento da ética contratual.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0080.009
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l ERSUMASame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207