How much K is OK? Evaluating different methods for K-concentration determination and the effect of the internal K concentration on feldspar luminescence dating
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. For luminescence dating of potassium-rich (K) feldspars, the presence of 40K within the K-feldspar grains contributes significantly to the internal dose rate of the sample. Whilst it is common practice to determine uranium, thorium,, and potassium concentrations for external dose rate calculations, the vast majority of studies do not measure the internal K concentration. Instead, most studies apply published K concentrations of 10 ± 2 % (Smedley et al., 2012), 12.5 ± 0.5 % (Huntley and Baril, 1997), or 13 ± 1 % (Zhao and Li, 2005) to their samples. The use of these high literature-based K concentrations is usually justified by two assumptions: (i) only K-feldspar grains with high K concentrations contribute to the luminescence signal significantly, and (ii) we reliably exclude Na-feldspar luminescence signals using filters, with a narrow transmission window around the K-feldspar emission peak of ∼ 410 nm. However, these assumptions may not apply to all samples, and assuming K concentrations that are too high might result in significant dose rate overestimation. To investigate the effect of the internal K concentration on the dose rate and the validity of the above-mentioned assumptions, we determine the K concentration of a set of 10 density-separated sand-sized K-feldspar samples of different geological origin and chemical composition using four different techniques. We quantify their K concentration on the bulk level using a wavelength-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometer and a β counter and on the single-grain level using a micro X-ray fluorescence spectrometer and a scanning electron microscope (SEM) with an energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDX) attachment. We use the SEM-EDX single-grain results to calculate two luminescence-weighted K estimates. These two estimates, effective K and luminescent grains, connect the K concentration of a grain to its luminescence signal intensity. Our experimental results show that (1) there is a good agreement between bulk and average single-grain K-concentration measurements, (2) single-grain K concentrations within one sample can be highly variable across the entire physically possible range of K concentrations for feldspars, and (3) the blue luminescence emission is not dominated by K-rich feldspar grains. For most samples there are considerable differences between the published and the measured K concentrations. These differences result in overestimation of the total dose rate of up to 34.6 % compared to dose rates calculated using measured K concentrations. We therefore suggest routinely measuring the bulk K concentration of each sample, complemented by additional single-grain K-concentration measurements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it