MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Score-Based Manifold Projection for Diffusion-Based Inverse Problems

2025· article· W4415367114 on OpenAlexaff
S. Hamidi, En‐hui Yang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldMathematics
TopicNumerical methods in inverse problems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsManifold (fluid mechanics)Robustness (evolution)InverseInverse problemDiffusion mapProjection (relational algebra)Nonlinear dimensionality reductionManifold alignmentOblique projection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inverse problems such as inpainting, deblurring, and super-resolution benefit significantly from generative diffusion models, which serve as powerful learned priors. However, incorporating measurement-consistency gradients naively can push the intermediate solutions off the high-likelihood manifold encoded by the diffusion model, leading to artifacts or suboptimal reconstructions. In this paper, we propose a scorebased manifold projection framework that leverages the internal score function of the diffusion model itself to preserve manifold fidelity. Specifically, we exploit the fact that the diffusion score$\boldsymbol{s}_{\theta}(\boldsymbol{x}, t) \approx \nabla_{\boldsymbol{x}} \log p_{t}(\boldsymbol{x})$is ideally orthogonal to manifolds of constant log-likelihood at time$t$. By removing the component of the measurement gradient parallel to$\boldsymbol{s}_{\theta}$, our method constrains each update to remain (to first order) tangent to the learned data manifold. Theoretically, we prove that our approach preserves proximity to the manifold more effectively than an un-projected update, and empirically, we demonstrate improved robustness and quality on various inverse problems, including deblurring, inpainting, and super-resolution. Our results show that scorebased manifold projection not only reduces artifacts but also maintains the fidelity of the reconstructions, offering a simple yet effective enhancement to measurement-guided diffusion solvers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNumerical methods in inverse problemsFrench-language works237,207