MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Scam Guard: Intelligent Scam Protection for Users

2025· article· W4415367568 on OpenAlexaff
Neha Jadhav, C Pranalee, C Prapti, M Ruhita, Neha Reddy, S. Parvathy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpam and Phishing Detection
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGuard (computer science)Android (operating system)Communication sourcePhishingUser agentKey (lock)Service providerSpamming

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the growing use of messaging platforms like WhatsApp, users face more harmful content such as phishing links, malware, fake media, and inappropriate language. This paper introduces Scam Guard, a lightweight and non-intrusive system for Android that protects users from these threats in real-time. It uses Android's Accessibility Service to monitor incoming messages and conduct multi-layered analysis, including keyword detection, regular expression-based link scanning, and integration with external threat intelligence APIs like VirusTotal. It also checks media files for forgery using image analysis techniques and hides harmful or sensitive content from the screen to limit user exposure. Scam Guard classifies messages as safe, questionable, or dangerous. It quickly alerts users with contextual notifications, providing options to block the sender or dismiss the message. The system works without needing root access, which helps preserve user privacy and device integrity. Key components include the Accessibility Service, Notification Manager, Broadcast Receivers, and a Contact Management Module. By providing a real-time, privacy-focused security solution, Scam Guard aims to improve user safety against modern scam tactics on messaging apps.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpam and Phishing DetectionFrench-language works237,207