MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modeling Grid-Connected EV Fleets, Heat Pumps, and Solar PV in Residential Communities

2025· article· W4415368016 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ahmad Mohsenimanesh, Christopher McNevin, Evgueniy Entchev

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
FundersOffice of Energy
KeywordsRenewable energyPhotovoltaic systemPhotovoltaicsSolar energyElectricity generationZero-energy buildingEnergy consumptionGridDistributed generation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Environmental concerns are driving a global shift toward sustainable solutions. Renewable energy technologies, such as solar photovoltaics (PV) and air source heat pumps (ASHPs), along with electric vehicles (EVs), are increasingly being integrated into residential buildings as part of this transition. This integration is particularly crucial in developing countries, where energy systems must accommodate growing demand while ensuring environmental sustainability. This paper presents a scenario-based study for a residential community of 500 detached residences, incorporating a fleet of EVs- two vehicles for each household- and a renewable energy system (RES) that includes ASHPs and rooftop and ground-mounted PV generation. The system aims to enhance alignment between local energy generation and consumption while minimizing energy costs and emissions in the Mahone Bay community, Nova Scotia. The EV fleet model was simulated in Python, with data derived from 1,000 EVs across Canada between 2017 and 2019, encompassing charging patterns for thirty-five different vehicle models. The heating power model for residential buildings is simulated using TRNSYS, with data gathered from energy bills collected over the course of a year. The optimal solution employs HOMER GRID software to improve the economic and environmental performance of the RES. The bestperforming system comprises a 10-MW grid-connected rooftop $P V$ and ground-mounted solar power generation to supply the community load. It generates annual savings for the residential community of ${\$}$1,492,910 and a total of ${\$}$ 37,322,740 in utility bills over its 25-year lifetime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.348
Threshold uncertainty score0.691

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207