Remote sensing and machine learning integration to detect and forecast floods in Lodwar Town, Turkwel Basin, Kenya
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reliable flood monitoring and prediction remain a challenge in data-scarce regions, particularly in arid and semi-arid environments. This study explores the integration of remote sensing data and machine learning techniques to improve flood detection and early warning capabilities in Lodwar Town of the Turkwel Basin, Kenya. This depended on finding a relationship between daily rainfall and Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI). Among multiple rainfall products evaluated, Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station (CHIRPS) was selected due to its fine spatial resolution and performance. Daily NDWI time series derived from Aqua MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) imagery were used as a proxy for water accumulation and flood indicators. A python-based Decision Tree Regressor (DTR) model was trained using the daily CHIRPS rainfall data with various lag times, along with auxiliary meteorological variables including relative humidity, wind speed, and mean temperature for the period from 2002 to 2024 to predict NDWI of Lodwar Town. The machine learning model substantially improved the correlation between rainfall and NDWI, raising the correlation coefficient by 25%. Spatial analysis of rainfall-NDWI correlation revealed that areas in the west, northwest, and southwest of Lodwar Town, with elevations between 508 m and 648 m have high correlation. Rainfall in these regions can serve as signal for potential rapid flooding with 0-day lag-time in Lodwar Town situated at an elevation of approximately 500 m. These areas are not necessarily the primary high rainfall sources, rather they act as signal zones for floods of Lodwar Town that can provide flood early warning information. The proposed methodology in this study can offer a practical approach to anticipatory action and flood risk reduction for vulnerable communities in remote regions with no or limited hydrometeorological stations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".