Effectiveness of Transurethral Bulkamid Injections as an Adjunct to the AdVance XP Sling for Male Patients with Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Bulkamid® (Axonics, Irvine, CA, USA) is a non-particulate polyacrylamide hydrogel used in the treatment of urinary incontinence. While its effectiveness is well-documented in female stress urinary incontinence (SUI), there is limited data on its role in male stress urinary incontinence, particularly post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI). This study evaluates the efficacy of Bulkamid as a primary or adjunctive treatment for male PPI. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on male patients who developed PPI and underwent Bulkamid injections between 2016 and 2021. Data collected included pre- and post-procedure pad usage, the volume of Bulkamid injected, prior and subsequent incontinence treatments, and patient-reported satisfaction. Bulkamid was injected transurethrally in four quadrants near the vesicourethral anastomosis using a rigid cystoscope. Results: Twenty-one men with a history of radical prostatectomy (six open and fifteen robotic), including four who received adjuvant radiotherapy, were included. Fifteen underwent Bulkamid injection as a primary treatment, with five (33%) requiring repeat injections due to initial improvement. Eight (54%) subsequently underwent an AdVance XP® sling placement, while two (13%) required no further treatment. Six patients received Bulkamid as an adjunct to prior incontinence surgery, with 80% of post-sling patients reporting improved continence. Bulkamid was less effective in men with detrusor overactivity or prior radiation. Conclusions: Bulkamid demonstrated a higher success rate as an adjunct to the AdVance XP sling, with 80% of men experiencing improved continence. As a primary treatment for PPI, success was modest, with only 33% achieving improvement, often requiring repeat injections or conversion to a sling. Bulkamid presents a low-risk option for select male PPI patients, particularly those with prior sling placement, but durability and long-term effectiveness remain concerns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".