MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415382050 · doi:10.1186/s12887-025-06128-z

SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy and infant outcomes in the first year of life: a retrospective cohort study

2025· article· en· W4415382050 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Karen Wong, Robin Ducharme, Malia S. Q. Murphy, Anna E. Clarke, Jason Brophy, Steven Hawken, Darine El‐Chaâr

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Pediatrics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Impact on Reproduction
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsRetrospective cohort studyPregnancyOffspringCohort studyMEDLINEYoung adult

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: There are known maternal and obstetrical risks following SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy, but the impact on offspring is not well known. The objective of this study was to examine offspring risks of hospitalization and emergency department visits in the first year of life following SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada of infants born from March 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021 using health administrative databases. The exposure group was defined by a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test in pregnancy, while the comparator group included pregnancies without a positive test recorded. The primary outcomes included all-cause offspring hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) visits in the first year of life. Poisson regression was used to adjust for maternal sociodemographic factors, medical and obstetrical history, and health behaviours. The main secondary outcome was risk of infections (including respiratory, gastrointestinal and otitis media infections) in the first year of life. A sensitivity analysis was conducted in which individuals with a negative SARS-CoV-2 test served as the comparator group. RESULTS: There were 222,448 live births during the study period; following matching 45,958 pregnancies were included. Cases were matched on maternal age, geography, and last menstrual period date in a 10:1 ratio. The exposed group included 5,291 pregnancies and the comparator group included 40,667 pregnancies. There was no significant difference observed between groups in risk of hospitalization (aRR (95% CI): 1.10 (0.99-1.22)). Small increases in risk of both ED visits (aRR 1.12 (1.06-1.17)), and infections (aHR 1.16 (1.11-1.21) were observed in the exposed group. When the comparator group was limited to pregnancies with a negative SARS-CoV-2 test, there was no difference in risk of ED visits, but the increased risk of infections persisted. CONCLUSIONS: A positive SARS-CoV-2 test in pregnancy was not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization in the offspring's first year, which may be reassuring to parents and healthcare providers. However, there may be a small increased risk of offspring infections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC PediatricsSame topicCOVID-19 Impact on ReproductionFrench-language works237,207