MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415387013 · doi:10.5194/tc-19-4701-2025

Sea ice freeboard extrapolation from ICESat-2 to Sentinel-1

2025· article· en· W4415387013 on OpenAlexaff
Karl Kortum, Suman Singha, Gunnar Spreen

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œcryosphere · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersDeutsches Zentrum für Luft- und RaumfahrtDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsFreeboardSea iceSnowExtrapolationAltimeterElevation (ballistics)Ice cloudSpatial distributionArctic ice pack

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The Ice, Cloud and Land Elevation Satellite (ICESat-2) laser altimeter can capture sea ice freeboard along-track at both high vertical and high spatial resolutions. The measurement occurs along three strong and three weak parallel beams. Thus, the across-track direction is only very sparsely covered, and capturing the two-dimensional spatial distribution of freeboard at a high resolution using this instrument alone is not possible. This work shows how, in the early Arctic winter months of October and November, Sentinel-1 synthetic aperture radar (SAR) acquisitions help bridge this gap. Freeboard measurements are shown to be meaningfully extrapolated to a full two-dimensional mapping. To achieve this, it is sufficient to use the cross-polarised (HV) SAR backscatter to sort the pixels by intensity and then map freeboards measured from altimetry in the area via the cumulative distribution functions. With the presented algorithm, the snow and ice freeboard derived from altimetry can be extrapolated to Sentinel-1 SAR scenes, unlocking an additional dimension of Arctic freeboard monitoring at a high spatial resolution, with ice freeboard errors between 6 and 10.5 cm for spatial resolutions between 100 and 400 m.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œcryosphereSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207