“Taking Wendake Beyond Wendake”: Economic Development and Legal Tenacity in the Wendat Community
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The economic self-sufficiency of Indigenous communities has become a widely recognized debate in Canada. This article analyzes how the Indigenous community of Wendake, located in Québec, is working toward the cultural resurgence and recognition of its identity—in order to combat the negative consequences ensuing from the Indian Act of 1876. The latter resulted in Indigenous populations declared legally irresponsible to own their land. Drawing on Axel Honneth’s concept of the struggle for recognition, we show how the Wendat community relied on what we call its inherited capital of recognition (notably its ancestral political and economic dispositions) to peacefully assert itself in two key areas. First, the legal right to have treaties signed with colonial powers from past centuries recognized; and second, economic development through the creation of a financial system adapted to Indigenous specificities. Our analysis points to a process of peaceful struggle for the resurgence and recognition of Indigenous identity in what at first glance appears to be a process of neocolonial subjugation to the market economy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it