MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415393765 · doi:10.24124/2025/30588

Optimization of pavement maintenance and rehabilitation using pavement management system in Prince George

2025· dissertation· W4415393765 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lina Shehata

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPavement managementAsset managementPavement engineeringAsset (computer security)Mean squared errorDecision support systemDistressArtificial neural networkRegression analysisInternational Roughness Index

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

,Pavement Management Systems (PMS) are essential for guiding cost-effective and sustainable road maintenance, particularly in municipalities operating within harsh climates and under financial constraints. This research examines the optimization of pavement maintenance strategies for the City of Prince George, British Columbia, by combining historical condition data, predictive modeling, and decision-support frameworks. The study utilizes pavement distress survey results from 2016, 2017, 2020, and 2023 to assess network-level deterioration, identify critical distress types, and establish performance baselines. To forecast pavement performance, three modeling approaches—Random Forest (RF), Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN)—were applied to predict the Pavement Distress Index (PDI). These models were evaluated using the statistical metrics such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination (R²). The Random Forest model achieved the highest predictive accuracy (R² = 0.96, RMSE = 0.55), followed closely by the ANN (R² = 0.95, RMSE = 0.48), while the MLR model demonstrated lower predictive capability (R² = 0.81, RMSE = 0.92). Variable importance analysis identified transverse cracking, rutting, and surface roughness as the most influential predictors of deterioration. The findings of this research provide a data-driven framework for proactive pavement maintenance planning in Prince George, enabling the prioritization of high-impact interventions and the optimization of rehabilitation budgets. By extending pavement service life and reducing long-term maintenance costs, the proposed methodology supports the creation of more resilient transportation infrastructure. The framework can be adapted for use in other municipalities facing similar environmental and operational conditions, strengthening the integration of advanced analytics into municipal asset management practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.576
Threshold uncertainty score0.844

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringFrench-language works237,207