On the Fundamental Limits of Integrated Sensing and Communications Under Logarithmic Loss
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study a unified information-theoretic framework for integrated sensing and communications (ISAC), applicable to both monostatic and bistatic sensing scenarios. Special attention is given to the case where the sensing receiver (Rx) is required to produce a “soft" estimate of the state sequence, with logarithmic loss serving as the performance metric. We derive lower and upper bounds on the capacity-distortion function, which delineates the fundamental tradeoff between communication rate and sensing distortion. These bounds coincide when the channel between the ISAC transmitter (Tx) and the communication Rx is degraded with respect to the channel between the ISAC Tx and the sensing Rx, or vice versa. Furthermore, we provide a complete characterization of the capacity-distortion function for an ISAC system that simultaneously transmits information over a binary-symmetric channel and senses additive Bernoulli states through another binary-symmetric channel. The Gaussian counterpart of this problem is also explored, which, together with a state-splitting trick, fully determines the capacity-distortion-power function under the squared error distortion measure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.053 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".