MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Neural FIM: Bridging Statistical Manifolds and Generative Modeling through Fisher Geometry

2025· preprint· W4415402683 on OpenAlexaff
Yanlei Zhang, Guillaume Huguet, Edward De Brouwer, Danqi Liao, Oluwadamilola Fasina, Alexander Tong, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Guy Wolf, Maximilian Nickel, Ian Adelstein, Smita Krishnaswamy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsMila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridging (networking)Generative grammarInformation geometryStatistical manifoldDifferential geometryGenerative modelManifold (fluid mechanics)Statistical model

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While data diffusion-based embeddings are widely used in unsupervised learning to reveal the intrinsic geometry of data, they are fundamentally constrained by their discrete nature and inability to generalize beyond training points. This limitation obscures a key geometric property, the metric tensor, which encodes significant information about the intrinsic geometry of the data. To address this, we propose Neural FIM, a method that learns a continuous and differentiable representation of the data via Jensen-Shannon divergence, which enables the computation of the Fisher Information Metric (FIM). Neural FIM creates an extensible metric space from discrete point clouds, providing insights into various geometric characteristics such as volume and geodesics. Here, we introduce a new paradigm for computing geodesics via fast optimization of parametric curves, facilitating the interpolation of geodesic paths between points and geodesic flows between distributions. We demonstrate the utility of Neural FIM in selecting parameters for the PHATE visualization method and its ability to reveal local volume information, highlighting branching points in one toy dataset and two single-cell datasets involving IPSC reprogramming and embryoid body stem cell differentiation. Moreover, we show that the learned geodesics using neural FIM recover cell differentiation branches in the embryoid body data and outperforms state-of-the-art methods in single-cell population-level trajectory inference.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.469
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Numerical Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207