A Data-Driven Framework for Flood Mitigation: Transformer-Based Damage Prediction and Reinforcement Learning for Reservoir Operations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Floods are among the most destructive natural hazards, with damages expected to intensify under climate change and socio-economic pressures. Effective reservoir operation remains a critical yet challenging strategy for mitigating downstream impacts, as operators must navigate nonlinear system dynamics, uncertain inflow forecasts, and trade-offs between competing objectives. This study proposes a novel end-to-end data-driven framework that integrates process-based hydraulic simulations, a Transformer-based surrogate model for flood damage prediction, and reinforcement learning (RL) for reservoir gate operation optimization. The framework is demonstrated using the Coralville Reservoir (Iowa, USA) and two major historical flood events (2008 and 2013). Hydraulic and impact simulations with HEC-RAS and HEC-FIA were used to generate training data, enabling the development of a Transformer model that accurately predicts time-varying flood damages. This surrogate is coupled with a Transformer-enhanced Deep Q-Network (DQN) to derive adaptive gate operation strategies. Results show that the RL-derived optimal policy reduces both peak and time-integrated damages compared to expert and zero-opening benchmarks, while maintaining smooth and feasible operations. Comparative analysis with a genetic algorithm (GA) highlights the robustness of the RL framework, particularly its ability to generalize across uncertain inflows and varying initial storage conditions. Importantly, the adaptive RL policy trained on perturbed synthetic inflows transferred effectively to the hydrologically distinct 2013 event, and fine-tuning achieved near-identical performance to the event-specific optimal policy. These findings highlight the capability of the proposed framework to provide adaptive, transferable, and computationally efficient tools for flood-resilient reservoir operation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".