MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415403085 · doi:10.1177/01171968251390912

At home, everywhere and nowhere: Privilege, mobility and the digital nomad paradox in Southeast Asia

2025· article· en· W4415403085 on OpenAlexaff
Mariana Deganis Silva Gola, Cheng Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian and Pacific migration journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Economy and Work Transformation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoutheast asiaSituatedPrivilege (computing)Work (physics)FeelingEthnographyPerceptionQualitative research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research note explores digital nomadism in Southeast Asia as a form of North-South migration post-COVID-19 pandemic. Based on interviews with digital nomads across the region, it highlights a paradox: While they are an especially privileged form of migrants, their very privilege creates feelings of dislocation that are difficult to mitigate, making this lifestyle challenging to sustain. Digital nomads attempt to mitigate these challenges through fostering relationships, connecting with nature and gaining cultural perceptions while maintaining ties to their places of origin. This study offers potential new avenues of investigation into the future of work and mobility, situated in Southeast Asian Studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.452
Threshold uncertainty score0.637

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian and Pacific migration journalSame topicDigital Economy and Work TransformationFrench-language works237,207