MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Confounding factors affect hemocyte responses of mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis upon foodborne exposure to polystyrene nanoplastics of three sizes

2025· article· en· W4415404274 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Nagore González-Soto, Tamer Hafez, Marisa P. Sárria, Gabriella F. Schirinzi, Eider Bilbao, Amaia Orbea, Douglas Gilliland, Miquel Àngel Serra, Miren P. Cajaraville

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Science of The Total Environment · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Regional Development FundEusko JaurlaritzaEuskampus FundazioaEuropean CommissionJoint Research CentreMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónCanadian Anesthesiologists' SocietyHezkuntza, Hizkuntza Politika Eta Kultura Saila, Eusko Jaurlaritza
KeywordsMytilusMusselMolluscaShellfishToxicityAcclimatizationHemocyte

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Information regarding the impact of nanoplastics (NPs, ≤ 1 μm) on marine organisms is insufficient. This work aimed to investigate the differential toxicity of three sizes of polystyrene (PS) NPs (50, 200 and 1000 nm) on the hemocytes and condition index (CI) of sentinel marine mussels Mytilus galloprovincialis . Mussels were dietarily exposed for 7 days through microalgae to PS at a low dose (LD: 10 3 NPs/mL) and a high dose (HD: 10 8 NPs/mL of 50 and 200 nm NPs, and 10 6 NPs/mL of 1000 nm NPs). Each experiment (E) was performed twice, as follows: E1 and E4 for 50 nm PS NPs, E2 and E5 for 200 nm PS NPs and E3 and E6 for 1000 nm PS NPs. Despite the six experiments were run in less than a month, there were significant differences between the independent experiments of the different sizes of PS NPs. No differences in CI were found within each experiment, but differences were observed between independent experiments, possibly due to the spawning events observed during the acclimation of mussels of E3-E4. Similarly, a higher ROS production occurred in hemocytes of control mussels of E3-E4 compared to E1-E2 and E5-E6. But no differences in ROS were recorded in NPs treatments compared to controls within experiments. Cell viability of control hemocytes decreased in E3-E4 and E5-E6 in comparison to E1-E2. This could mask the size-dependent response to the NPs, as in E1 hemocytes showed lower viability and phagocytic activity than those from control mussels, but not in E4. Similarly, hemocytes of mussels exposed to HD in E2 showed lower viability than controls, but the contrary was observed in E5. In conclusion, a trend for size-dependent effects on mussel hemocytes was observed. However, hemocyte responses varied along time, possibly due to seasonal variations in mussels physiology connected with the gametogenic cycle. • Mussels were dietarily exposed 7d to 50, 200 and 1000 nm PS NPs in duplicate, twice. • 50 nm NPs caused the largest impact affecting hemocytes viability and phagocytosis. • 200 nm PS NPs caused a decrease in hemocytes cell viability. • No detrimental effect was observed in hemocytes of mussels exposed to 1000 nm NPs. • Responses changed overtime, possibly due to seasonal changes in mussels' physiology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Science of The Total EnvironmentSame topicMicroplastics and Plastic PollutionFrench-language works237,207