Interdisciplinary Management of Varicella-Zoster Virus Infection: Integrating Medical Treatment, Nursing Care, and Health Information Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) is a highly contagious pathogen causing two distinct clinical entities: primary infection (chickenpox) and reactivation (herpes zoster). While often self-limiting in healthy children, VZV poses significant risks of severe complications in adults, immunocompromised individuals, and pregnant women, leading to hospitalizations and mortality. Aim: This article aims to provide a comprehensive, interdisciplinary review of VZV management, integrating perspectives from medical treatment, nursing care, and health information systems to optimize patient outcomes and public health control. Methods: The approach is a synthesis of current clinical guidelines and literature. It details diagnostic methods (clinical assessment, PCR, serology), medical management (antiviral therapy, symptomatic care), and public health strategies (isolation, vaccination, post-exposure prophylaxis). The role of nursing in patient education and supportive care, alongside the contribution of health information systems to surveillance and coordination, is emphasized. Results: Effective management hinges on risk stratification. Supportive care suffices for immunocompetent children, whereas early antiviral therapy (e.g., acyclovir) is critical for high-risk groups. Vaccination has dramatically reduced disease incidence and severity. Post-exposure prophylaxis with varicella-zoster immune globulin (VZIG) or vaccination can prevent or modify disease. Nursing care is vital for symptom relief and preventing complications like bacterial superinfection. Conclusion: A successful approach to VZV requires a coordinated, interprofessional model. Integrating timely medical intervention, dedicated nursing support, and robust health information systems is essential for reducing transmission, managing complications, and improving individual and population health outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".