aPhyloGeo: a Python application for correlating genetic and climatic conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Environmental variation and its influence on genetic diversity is a central topic in evolutionary biology and phylogeography. Accurate correlations between genetic and climatic datasets to understand the genetic adaptations of different species to specific environments. It requires integrated and reproducible workflows. RESULTS: We developed aPhyloGeo, an open-source and multiplatform application implemented in Python, for investigating correlations between genetic variation and environmental data within a phylogenetic framework. The workflow integrates multiple analytical steps, including sequence alignment, sliding window phylogenetic inference, and statistical approaches such as the Mantel test and the Procrustean randomization test. These analyses enable the identification of mutation hotspots that exhibit strong associations with environmental variables. In addition, aPhyloGeo supports multicore data processing and provides a fully reproducible pipeline for evaluating localized relationships between genomic variation and climatic distributions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: aPhyloGeo is freely available on GitHub at: https://github.com/tahiri-lab/aPhyloGeo, as both a PyPI package and as Python scripts for Linux, macOS, and Windows.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".