Neo-population and energy transition in the non-existent Apennines. The Gagliano Aterno experiment and the NEO Project
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Through a strategic and transformative approach, the aim is to facilitate constructive dialogue between local communities and external entities, reconciling urban-centric and polycentric visions. The growing awareness of climate change emphasizes the importance of valuing marginalized spaces, particularly in mountainous areas, where experimenting with energy and digital transitions presents significant opportunities. Public anthropology, with its ethnographic methodology, provides a profound understanding of local realities, while the mutualism between new and longstanding residents fosters meaningful synergies. This cultural interaction enriches communities and stimulates creative processes, suggesting that rediscovering life in small mountain villages can serve as a valuable resource for future social and community developments. Renewable energy communities emerge as essential tools for transforming perceptions and planning territory with a sense of self-determination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it