MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415416613 · doi:10.53555/4kcxs896

Seasonal Dynamics of Water Quality Parameters Supporting Lates calcarifer in the Vasishta Godavari Estuary, India

2022· article· W4415416613 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Vijaya Deepika. R Vijaya Deepika. R, Sridhar Dumpala, Ramaneswari kakaralapudi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFish Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatesEstuaryWater qualitySalinitySeasonalityAquacultureMonsoonHabitatAquatic ecosystem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The health and sustainability of estuarine fish species like Lates calcarifer depend on the stability and quality of their aquatic environment. This study investigates seasonal variations pre-monsoon, monsoon, and post-monsoon in key water quality parameters in the Vasishta Godavari estuary near Narasapuram, Andhra Pradesh, India, over two years (2013–2015). Parameters analyzed include temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), salinity, alkalinity, and total hardness. Results indicate that while most parameters fall within suitable ranges for L. calcarifer, distinct seasonal trends influence habitat conditions. Pre-monsoon months showed elevated temperatures and salinity; monsoon seasons introduced freshwater inflow, reducing salinity and pH; post-monsoon conditions stabilized water chemistry but increased nutrient concentrations. This seasonal analysis enhances our understanding of L. calcarifer ecobiology and emphasizes the importance of seasonal monitoring for sustainable estuarine fisheries and aquaculture practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.163
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.128 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Survey in Fisheries SciencesSame topicFish Biology and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207