Precise modulation of dissolution, therapeutic ion release, and biocompatibility in bioactive glasses
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study investigates the controlled dissolution and ion release kinetics of multicomponent borate glasses within the borate anomaly, focusing on therapeutic ions such as calcium, zinc, and fluorine, which are critical in applications ranging from cancer therapy to bone regeneration and oral health. A Design of Mixtures (DoM) statistical modeling approach was employed to systematically evaluate the effects of glass composition on dissolution, ion release, and cytotoxicity. By synthesizing 23 glass formulations, the study demonstrates how statistical modeling enables precise prediction and control of material properties, revealing key interactions between components that are difficult to identify using traditional methods. Notably, higher ZnO content stabilized the glass network, reducing dissolution and ion release rates. The approach also uncovered complex synergies between zinc, titanium, and calcium, emphasizing the value of a multifactorial approach in optimizing glass performance. While higher ZnO concentrations (i.e., 16–20 mol%) correlated with increased cytotoxicity in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), several formulations exhibited no cytotoxic effects at a concentration of 0.2 g/mL, highlighting the need for careful compositional tuning. This research demonstrates how integrating experimental and computational methods can permit the design of glasses with tailored dissolution and ion release kinetics, enabling more effective, customizable, and personalized medical treatments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it