MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415418349 · doi:10.1155/and/5003971

Varicocele‐Induced Male Infertility: A Bibliometric Perspectives of Mechanistic Insights and Clinical Trends

2025· article· en· W4415418349 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAndrologia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersChina Academy of Chinese Medical SciencesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsVaricoceleInfertilityFertilityBibliometricsMale infertilityBiomedicineChinaMale fertility

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Male infertility (MI) has become a global public health challenge, and varicocele (VC) is considered a common cause of male reproductive disorders. Although scientific research on MI has increased in recent years, there is still a significant lack of systematic integration and analysis of related publications. Objective This study employs bibliometric methods to conduct a comprehensive visual analysis of research on MI and VC from 2004 to 2024, aiming to depict the evolutionary trajectory, knowledge framework, and research frontiers in this field. Methods Tools such as VOSviewer, CiteSpace, Scimago Graphica, Pajek, R‐bibliometrix, and R packages were used for bibliometric analysis and visualization of literature retrieved from the Web of Science database. Results From 2004 to 2024, publications on MI and VC have shown exponential growth, with the most pronounced increase occurring in 2020. At the national level, United States and China were the major contributors. Institutionally, the Cleveland Clinic and McGill University emerged as leading research centers. At the author level, Agarwal A. and Esteves S.C. were identified as the most influential contributors. Regarding journals, Andrologia and Fertility and Sterility served as major publication platforms. Keyword analysis delineated the key research domains within MI and VC. High‐frequency keywords such as oxidative stress, DNA fragmentation, and spermatogenesis underscored the central research focus on oxidative damage and spermatogenic mechanisms, whereas terms such as varicocelectomy and microsurgery highlighted the sustained clinical interest in surgical interventions. Burst detection suggested a recent shift of research hotspots toward inflammation, lipid peroxidation, obesity, and antioxidant therapies such as vitamin E. Strategic diagram analysis further demonstrated that this field integrates both fundamental and interdisciplinary characteristics. Core topics such as testis and apoptosis were identified, along with well‐developed but relatively isolated directions, collectively reflecting a trend of progressive integration from mechanistic exploration to clinical application. Conclusion Through bibliometric analysis, this study reveals a significant upward trend in research on MI and VC, reflecting the growing academic attention to multiple directions within the field. Moreover, it systematically maps the intellectual structure and developmental trajectory of the discipline, providing a comprehensive framework for understanding its current status, research foci, and emerging trends.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.010
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it