Stable Isotope Monitoring in a Semi-Arid Olive Orchard Suggest Changes in Ecohydrological Dynamics from Contrasting Drip Irrigation Regimes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In semi-arid regions of Morocco, where the majority of water withdrawals are devoted to irrigation, optimizing irrigation practices in agriculture is a national priority in the face of recurring droughts and growing pressure on groundwater resources. However, the hydrological impacts of different drip-irrigation systems in the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum remain insufficiently understood. We monitored the stable isotope composition (δ2H, δ18O) across the two agricultural plots in Marrakech (Morocco) with surface drip and subsurface drip irrigation treatments for a complete hydrologic year (June 2022 to June 2023). Weekly to daily samples of rainfall, irrigation water, groundwater, and soil at various depths (5–50 cm) were sampled, and water from branch xylem was extracted using the cryogenic vacuum distillation method. We found that the subsurface irrigation treatment, which delivered water directly to the root zone, maintained narrow isotopic ranges in water of soils beyond 30 cm, as well as in branch xylem and leaf water. By contrast, surface irrigation treatment plots showed pronounced evaporative isotopic enrichment: summer topsoil water δ18O peaked at −1.1‰ (vs. −8.7‰ in subsurface irrigation treatment), and leaf water reached +13‰ (vs. +8‰ in subsurface). Despite this larger isotopic heterogeneity in surface irrigation site, branch xylem water δ18O remained within −6 to 2.5‰ across all soil depth, similar to subsurface irrigation treatment, which ranged between −5 and 0‰. This suggests that olive roots accessed soil water uniformly from the upper 50 cm under both irrigation treatments. Seasonal xylem isotopic enrichment in spring and midsummer mirrored shifts towards shallow, evaporatively altered soil water under surface irrigation, but not under the subsurface. The results suggest that subsurface drip irrigation can significantly improve drought resilience and water-use efficiency in the expanding olive sector of the Maghreb, while continuous isotope monitoring serves as a practical approach to enhance sustainable and adaptive water management in water-limited regions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".