MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415423923 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfaf116.0670

#566 Global home medication practices in dialysis patients – applying NDC-to-ATC mapping

2025· article· en· W4415423923 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Astrid Feuersenger, Melanie Wolf, Yue Jiao, Judith Wiegand, Ottó Árkossy, Jan Walter, Hans-Juergen Arens, John W. Larkin

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedical prescriptionDialysisDiagnosis codeZip codeCoding (social sciences)Home dialysisKidney diseaseCode (set theory)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background and Aims Comparing global medication prescribing practices is a major challenge in international healthcare research due to differing drug coding systems, such as the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) and National Drug Code (NDC). As global patterns of medication use in dialysis remain undefined, this study applies a publicly available NDC-to-ATC mapping algorithm to a global dialysis dataset, ApolloDialDbTM, covering 40 countries. This approach enables the inclusion of US data in global analyses. To offer a real-world perspective, we assessed the most commonly prescribed medications administered at home by dialysis patients across regions. Method Apollo DialDb includes anonymized data from over 540,000 adult dialysis patients in a global kidney network (Jan 2018–Mar 2021, Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, DE). Data anonymization was performed in alignment with recommendations from a re-identification risk determination (Privacy Analytics, Ontario, CA). Home medications were analyzed based on the top (most common) five pharmacological classes defined by the first 4-digits of ATC code and stratified by region. A publicly available NDC-to-ATC mapping algorithm, based on FDA logic, queried the RxNorm API to assign ATC classes to NDCs. Results In the US dataset, 41% of NDCs had no ATC match, 36% matched to a single ATC, and 23% matched to multiple ATC codes. Analyses included only NDCs with a single ATC match (5,781,841). A total of 7,377,688 ATC code classes for home prescriptions were analyzed: USA (78%), EMEA (Europe, Middle East, Africa, 14%), LA (Latin America, 6%), and AP (Asia Pacific, 2%). Each ATC code entry represents a documented prescription of varying duration. Across all regions, the top ATC classes of home medications were ‘All other therapeutic products’ (11.52%), ‘Beta blocking agents’ (7.11%), ‘Lipid modifying agents, plain’ (5.21%), ‘Insulins and analogues’ (4.90%), and ‘Peptic ulcer and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease’ (4.18%). In the US, where 78% of ATC entries originated, the first four ATC classes were identical, but ‘Other analgesics and antipyretics’ (4.47%) replaced the fifth and was just included in the US top 5 list. ‘Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), plain’ (6.34%) as well as ‘Vitamin B12 and folic acid’ (5.07%) were just listed in LA. In AP, phosphate binders, antithrombotics, and antihypertensives were among the top 5. In EMEA, these medications were also in the top 5, with the addition of vitamin A&D (Fig. 1). Conclusion A publicly available NDC-to-ATC mapping algorithm enabled integration of US NDC-coded data into global analyses of medication patterns in dialysis based on ATC classes using ApolloDialDb. Approximately 60% of NDCs were mapped to at least one ATC class. Medication use in dialysis varies regionally: phosphate binders and antihypertensives are top home prescriptions globally, while lipid-modifying agents, antidiabetics, and analgesics and antipyretics dominate in the US. In EMEA, vitamin A&D and antithrombotics are more prevalent. These insights provide benchmarks for the community, highlighting the need for further research on treatment duration and real-world use of emerging drugs (e.g., GLP-1 drugs, HIF-PH inhibitors).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesFrench-language works237,207