#3251 Nefecon provides kidney benefit irrespective of time since diagnosis in patients with IgAN: a subanalysis of the NefIgArd study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background and Aims Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is a chronic immune-mediated kidney disease characterized by galactose-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1) deposition in the glomeruli. The Peyer's patches of the gut-associated lymphoid tissue are a major site of Gd‑IgA1-producing B cells. Nefecon is an oral targeted-release formulation of budesonide, which targets drug release into the distal ileum. Nefecon has been shown to reduce the loss of kidney function in adults with primary IgAN who are at risk of disease progression. Results from the Phase 3 NefIgArd study demonstrated that nefecon 16 mg/day reduced proteinuria and preserved estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over 9 months of treatment. Proteinuria and eGFR benefit were sustained for up to 15 months of observational follow-up in patients with primary IgAN. Since IgAN is a progressive disease, early diagnosis and intervention in IgAN are pivotal to slow the irreversible loss of nephrons and prevent progression to kidney failure. Here, we present results from a subanalysis of the NefIgArd study evaluating the effect of nefecon 16 mg/day according to time since IgAN diagnosis by biopsy at baseline. Method NefIgArd study design and study endpoints have been previously described. Briefly, eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with biopsy-confirmed primary IgAN diagnosed within the past 10 years, eGFR 35–90 mL/min/1.73 m2, persistent proteinuria ≥1 g/24 hours despite optimized renin–angiotensin system (RAS) inhibition, and well-controlled blood pressure. Patients received nefecon 16 mg/day or placebo for 9 months (n = 182 per treatment group) in addition to supportive care (RAS inhibition), followed by a 15-month observational period on supportive care only. This subanalysis reports eGFR and urine protein–creatinine ratio (UPCR) change over time during the NefIgArd study. Patients were divided into quartiles according to time since IgAN diagnosis by biopsy at baseline. Results Mean time since diagnosis was 4.3 years in the overall population (Table 1). Quartile 1 was <0.6 years since diagnosis, quartile 2 was 0.6 to <2.4 years since diagnosis, quartile 3 was 2.4 to <6.4 years since diagnosis, and quartile 4 was ≥6.4 years since diagnosis. Nefecon, compared with placebo, was associated with eGFR benefit across all quartiles. In patients diagnosed <0.6 years prior to baseline, eGFR was preserved with nefecon relative to placebo by +6.41, +5.78, and +4.79 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 9, 12, and 24 months, respectively. In patients diagnosed >6.4 years prior to baseline, eGFR was preserved with nefecon relative to placebo by +6.95, +3.61, and +5.07 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 9, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Nefecon was also associated with reduction in UPCR across all quartiles. In patients diagnosed <0.6 years prior to baseline, nefecon reduced UPCR versus placebo by 22.01%, 51.12%, and 18.52% at 9, 12, and 24 months, respectively. In patients diagnosed >6.4 years prior to baseline, nefecon reduced UPCR versus placebo by 16.74%, 42.88%, and 35.48% at 9, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Overall, patients diagnosed with IgAN <0.6 years prior to baseline maintained kidney function to a greater extent over the 2 years than other quartiles (Fig. 1). Conclusion This NefIgArd subanalysis demonstrated that nefecon conferred treatment benefit in all patients versus placebo, irrespective of time since diagnosis; however, nefecon preserved kidney function to a greater extent versus placebo in patients recently diagnosed with IgAN. This supports the benefit of early initiation of nefecon treatment to slow disease progression and loss of kidney function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".