MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415428526 · doi:10.3233/faia251014

Selection in the Meme Pool: Graph-Based Evolution of Textual Content

2025· book-chapter· W4415428526 on OpenAlexaff
Karlo Babić

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLanguage and cultural evolution
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSelection (genetic algorithm)Variation (astronomy)Process (computing)Code (set theory)Function (biology)Source codeContent (measure theory)Memetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a computational framework for simulating the evolution of text by modeling textual units as memes – replicable cultural information analogous to genes. Memes occupy nodes in a graph, where edges represent pathways of interaction. Memes propagate probabilistically along these edges based on weights. Following propagation, a fitness function evaluates each meme, guiding a selection process based on configurable criteria. This selection determines whether Large Language Models (LLMs) then introduce variation by mutating or merging memes, adapting content during transmission. Through iterative cycles of propagation, selection, and variation, the system models how memes evolve, spread, and adapt within networked populations. Source code is available at https://github.com/karlo-babic/graph-meme-pool/.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in artificial intelligence and applicationsSame topicLanguage and cultural evolutionFrench-language works237,207