MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415430082 · doi:10.1302/1358-992x.2025.10.072

HIP DYSPLASIA: RISK FACTORS AND THEIR ASSOCIATED DIAGNOSTIC SEVERITY

2025· article· en· W4415430082 on OpenAlexaff
Tony Ricci, Victoria Nguyen, Kishore Mulpuri, Emily K. Schaeffer

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthopaedic Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLogistic regressionProspective cohort studySeverity of illnessRisk factorAcetabulumHip dysplasiaDysplasiaFemoral head

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) affects 1–3% of all infants, making it the most common pediatric hip disorder. The spectrum of DDH spans from mild dysplasia of the acetabulum to a hip that is dislocated and irreducible, resulting in severe long-term issues including pain, limping, and early-onset osteoarthritis of the hip. Previous studies have focused on identifying risk factors for DDH, what remains unknown however is the relationship between DDH risk factors and the severity of dysplasia at diagnosis. The aim of this study was to determine whether certain DDH risk factors had a stronger association with severity of hip dysplasia at time of diagnosis. Data from a global, prospective registry of patients diagnosed with DDH was analyzed. Clinical and radiologic diagnostic data was utilized to correlate DDH risk factors with severity of dysplasia. For this study, severity was characterized by four categorical variables: clinical (dislocated and irreducible hip), ultrasound (a-angle < 4 5-degrees, femoral head coverage < 3 5%), and radiograph (IHDI classification three or four). Potential risk factors included breech presentation, family history, female, first born, and swaddling history, and were assessed using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. Multivariable models included all risk factors with an additional adjustment for the contributing centre as a random effect. Out of the 4682 patients analyzed, 1515 were born breech, 644 had an immediate family history of DDH, 3878 were female, 2511 were first born, and 2133 had a history of swaddling. From a pathology severity standpoint, 573 patients clinically had a dislocated and irreducible hip, 954 had an alpha angle None of the risk factors were identified as having an increased association with a dislocated and irreducible hip on clinical examination, or with an IHDI Grade of three or four. In contrast, female and first-born infants had significant positive associations with ultrasound parameters of an alpha-angle of In addition to clinical examination, ultrasound remains one of the main diagnostic and monitoring hip dysplasia modalities. Our study identified that first born and female infants were more likely to have ultrasound-defined severe DDH at diagnosis. In North America, selective ultrasound screening is performed for infants with specific DDH risk factors, neither of which are female nor first born. Therefore, the stronger association between female and first born patients and DDH severity in comparison to other risk factors may be attributed to their omission from the selective screening process. While it may not be feasible to scan all first born and female infants by ultrasound, the results from our study emphasize the importance of clinically screening those of this profile at birth and thereafter to ensure enrollment into adequate monitoring and treatment programs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.718

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthopaedic ProceedingsSame topicHip disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207