MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415430182 · doi:10.1302/1358-992x.2025.10.056

FOOT AND ANKLE SCREENING AND TRIAGE CLINIC AND BUNION SCHOOL: IMPROVING ACCESS TO CARE FOR PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC ORTHOPAEDIC FOOT AND ANKLE CONDITIONS

2025· article· en· W4415430182 on OpenAlexaff
C. Lafontaine, Matthew Di Silvestro

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthopaedic Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsQueensway-Carleton Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFoot (prosody)AnkleTriageReferralOrthopedic surgeryFoot and ankle surgeryPatient education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patients with painful chronic foot and ankle conditions were facing wait times up to 5 years or longer to consult with a foot and ankle orthopaedic surgeon. The majority of patients require education in conservative treatment options rather than surgery. This program allows for improved access for patients requiring foot or ankle surgery, reduction in wait times for patient referral from GP to orthopaedic surgeon and ensures appropriate patients are referred for consult with the surgeon. It also allows for more detailed discussion with patients about their options and improved patient satisfaction. Based at three hospital sites in collaboration with the in-house foot and ankle surgeons, a specially trained physiotherapist performs a comprehensive 45-minute initial assessment of patients referred for specific chronic orthopaedic foot issues. Conservative and surgical options are reviewed as appropriate. If the patient is a potential candidate for surgery, they are placed in the queue for consultation with the surgeon. Given the high volume of referrals for patients with bunions, a targeted education session called “Bunion School” was developed and hosted at each site. The physiotherapist leads an hour-long education session for groups of patients referred for their bunions. If the patient wishes to pursue surgery, they are placed on the waitlist to consult with an orthopaedic surgeon. The program is funded by the provincial Ministry of Health. The FAST program and Bunion School improve the patient conversion rate to surgery for the orthopaedic surgeon from approximately 20% to 70–80%. Wait time to initial assessment pre-pandemic was 3 weeks and wait time to surgical consult was 3–6 months. Wait times have increased during the pandemic and currently are averaging 4–6 months to assessment and 6 months to surgical consult. Patient satisfaction rate for the initial assessment provided by the physiotherapist was 97%. Surgeon satisfaction was reported high, though not formally measured. The physiotherapist-led Foot and Ankle Screening and Triage Clinic and Bunion School have been successful regional initiatives, funded by the provincial Ministry of Health. These programs provide for timely patient education regarding their options prior to involving an orthopaedic surgeon. They enable patients to receive accurate information and allow for quicker access to care as well as cost-effectiveness within the health-care system. Surgical conversion rate was higher compared to patients seen directly by the surgeon without prior education. Patient and surgeon satisfaction were high.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthopaedic ProceedingsSame topicMusculoskeletal Disorders and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207