MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415430214 · doi:10.1302/1358-992x.2025.10.030

THE INFLUENCE OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON TOTAL HIP AND KNEE ARTHROPLASTY IN ONTARIO: A POPULATION-LEVEL ANALYSIS

2025· article· en· W4415430214 on OpenAlexaffabout
J. Sniderman, Jesse Wolfstadt, Amir Khoshbin

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthopaedic Proceedings · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopedic Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsConcordia Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicArthroplastyHealth careCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PopulationOsteoarthritisTotal knee arthroplastyEmergency departmentCohort

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The arrival of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) in March 2020 and the global pandemic that ensued resulted in province wide cancellations of elective surgery. The impact of this has yet to be reported at the population level in Canada in a universial healthcare setting. The purpose of the present study was to provide a review of the impact of COVID-19 on THA and TKA on orthopaedic surgeons and patients in the province of Ontario. Specific aims of the study were to identify changes at the population level in surgical volume, wait times and healthcare quality. Pre and peri-COVID-19 THA and TKA cohorts were developed with aggregate data collected from the Canadian Institute for Healthcare Information and Canadian Joint Replacement Registry. Inclusion criteria consisted of an inpatient THA or TKA performed in adult Ontario citizens for diagnosis of osteoarthritis between April 2016 and February 2021. Quality was assessed via patient length of stay, revisions, readmissions and emergency department presentations. Wait times for THA and TKA were collected from CIHI's publicly available data for Ontario. Statistical analysis was performed comparing patient cohorts via χ 2 and t-tests. In the year following the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic 27536 THA and TKAs were performed, representing a 30% reduction in case volume compared to the prior year. THA volume during this period decreased by 20%, while TKA volume decreased by 36%. There were significantly less medically complex underwent surgery during the COVID-19 time period (p =(p=0.025). Both THA and TKA patients were less likely to visit the emergency department within 30 days of surgery (p=in Ontario for surgical treatment shrunk from 85% in 2019 to 64% in 2020 for THA, while TKA decreased from 80% to 56% (p=< 0.001). The corresponding wait time to treatment increased by 64 days for THA and 78 days for TKA (p=< 0.001). The impact of COVID-19 on elective THA and TKA case volumes in Ontario during the 1st year of the COVID-19 pandemic was significant. We found an overall 30% decrease in primary THA and TKA volume between April 1, 2020 and March 1, 2021. This corresponded with an expected significant increase in surgical wait times for patients. Patients having surgery within the peri-COVID-19 time span were less medically complex, had shorter length of stays, were less likely to visit the emergency department following surgery and more likely to be discharged directly home.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthopaedic ProceedingsSame topicOrthopedic Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207